When Family Helps Raise Your Children

Listen to this article (BETA)

Preparing the reader…

Your progress: Not started

Mark Complete Start Over Reset History

▶ Listen

[ This is Part 3 of a 3 Part Series; Part 1 is here: Part 2, here ]

^{[Important Safety Note: This article addresses ordinary family relationships, disagreements, misunderstandings, and non-abusive conflict. Abuse, suspected child abuse or neglect, sexual misconduct or exploitation, domestic violence, self-harm or suicidal concerns, credible threats, serious substance-related danger, or other circumstances involving immediate or significant risk require a different response. Do not use the principles of private confrontation, confidentiality, family reconciliation, or “working it out together” to delay appropriate protection or professional intervention. When safety may be at risk, seek appropriate qualified professional, emergency, law-enforcement, child-protection, pastoral, or other responsible assistance as the circumstances require.]}

---

There are few gifts we can give our children more valuable than other trustworthy adults who genuinely love them. A good aunt can listen when a niece is embarrassed to talk with Mom. An uncle can say something to a nephew that Dad has said seventeen times and, mysteriously, Uncle Bob says it once and the boy suddenly thinks it is profound. Apparently wisdom occasionally improves when delivered by someone who does not remind you to clean your room. Grandparents carry history. Older cousins can sometimes translate between generations. Close family friends can become the people our children call when they need another wise voice.

As parents, we should not merely tolerate those relationships. When the people involved are trustworthy and godly, we should be deeply grateful for them. Our children need more people who love them, not fewer. Research on what developmental scholars sometimes call natural mentoring supports what many healthy families have known intuitively for generations: young people often benefit from meaningful relationships with caring adults outside the immediate parent-child relationship. Those naturally occurring mentors frequently include relatives, and the quality of the relationship appears to matter more than simply being able to say that a mentor exists.¹ ² Researchers studying aunts and uncles specifically have also described them serving as confidants, teachers, role models, mentors, and sometimes useful buffers within family relationships.³ ⁴ None of that should surprise Christians. God has never designed human formation as a two-person project.

Yet something complicated can happen inside that wonderful gift.

Imagine a fifteen-year-old girl who is frustrated with her mother and talks with her aunt. There is nothing inherently troubling about that. In fact, Mom may be thankful that her daughter has another mature woman she trusts. Aunt listens, asks questions, offers some advice, and perhaps says a few things about Mom’s decision. Later, Daughter tells Mom what Aunt said—or what Daughter understood Aunt to have said—and suddenly the conversation is no longer merely between a teenager and a trusted aunt.

Mom is concerned. Dad is less concerned because Aunt is his sister. He has known her all his life, and his immediate response is, “That’s not what she meant.” Mom thinks it matters very much what she meant because their daughter heard it a particular way. Dad believes Mom may be overreacting. Mom begins wondering whether Dad is protecting his sister rather than listening to his wife. Meanwhile, Daughter has discovered that Aunt understands her.

Perhaps Aunt does. Perhaps Mom needs to hear something. Perhaps Daughter has accurately described what happened but does not yet understand why Mom made the decision she made. Perhaps Aunt has heard only one side. Perhaps Aunt said something she should not have said. Perhaps Daughter unintentionally changed its meaning when she repeated it, or perhaps she intentionally emphasized the part that strengthened her case. Perhaps several of those things are true at once.

Welcome to family.

This is precisely where we can get into trouble if we begin by deciding who the bad person is. Maybe there isn’t one. Maybe there are several basically loving people standing in slightly wrong places, carrying pieces of the truth and stepping on one another’s toes. So the question is not simply, Who crossed the boundary? There is a better question: How can all of us use whatever influence God has given us to help this young person love God, love others, grow in wisdom, take responsibility, and become increasingly capable of living faithfully before Christ?

That question changes almost everything.

Begin With the Gift, Not the Boundary

Scripture gives parents a distinctive stewardship for their children. Moses tells God’s people to keep His words upon their hearts and to “teach them diligently to your children,” speaking of them throughout ordinary life—in the house, along the road, at bedtime, and when the family rises (Deuteronomy 6:6–7). Paul tells children to obey their parents in the Lord and fathers to bring their children up “in the discipline and instruction of the Lord” (Ephesians 6:1–4). Colossians gives us both sides of the relationship: “Children, obey your parents in everything,” while fathers are warned, “Do not provoke your children, so they will not become discouraged” (Colossians 3:20–21).

Notice the balance. Children really are under parental authority, and parents really are under God’s authority. The Bible does not give parents responsibility and then give them immunity from accountability for how they exercise it. Authority and accountability arrive in the same package.

Yet parental stewardship does not require parental exclusivity. Paul reminded Timothy of “the sincere faith within you, which first dwelt in your grandmother Lois and your mother Eunice” (2 Timothy 1:5). Later he reminded Timothy that he had known the sacred Scriptures from childhood (2 Timothy 3:14–15). His formation included family, Scripture, and eventually Paul himself as a spiritual father and mentor. Titus 2 gives us another intergenerational picture: older believers are to model maturity and teach younger believers what is good. The passage is not an instruction manual for aunts and uncles, and we should not pretend it is. Yet the broader biblical picture is unmistakable: God regularly uses relationships beyond father and mother to shape His people.

That should make Christian parents glad. The goal is not to construct a fence around our children high enough that nobody else can influence them. It is to surround them with trustworthy people whose influence helps them grow toward wisdom, responsibility, truth, reconciliation, and Christ. Sometimes another adult will see something we missed. Sometimes our child will tell Aunt what she has been afraid to tell us. Sometimes Uncle really will get through when Dad cannot. Sometimes Grandma will notice that something is wrong before anybody else does. Praise God for more eyes, more ears, more wisdom, and more love.

The difficulty begins when we confuse influence with responsibility, or when influence quietly begins competing with the relationships it was meant to strengthen.

Different People, Different Stewardships

Being a trusted adult in a child’s life is a privilege, but it is not a transfer of parental authority. Parents have been entrusted with parental responsibility. Extended family may possess tremendous relational influence. The child, particularly as adolescence progresses, is learning to carry increasing responsibility for his or her own choices, words, beliefs, relationships, and conduct. Those responsibilities overlap, but they are not interchangeable.

Aunt does not become Mom because Niece trusts her. Mom does not own every conversation Niece has because Mom is the parent. A teenager does not become an independent adult merely because she believes Mom is wrong. Each person has something to steward, and that word matters: stewardship. A steward does not own everything within reach; a steward faithfully handles what has actually been entrusted to him.

Parents steward parental responsibility. Aunts, uncles, grandparents, and other trusted adults steward influence. Children increasingly learn to steward their own choices, words, relationships, and eventually their own lives before God. Spouses steward their marriage and their shared parenting. Everybody stewards the tongue. Family relationships become tangled when we start carrying what belongs to someone else, neglecting what belongs to us, or trying to control what God has entrusted to another person. Healthy families do not eliminate overlapping influence. They learn to steward it.

When a Child Comes to You

Imagine that your niece sits down at your kitchen table and says, “Mom is being completely unreasonable.” You have just been entrusted with something precious: her confidence. Perhaps there are tears. Perhaps there is anger. Perhaps you have heard enough about your sister’s parenting over the years that part of you is already thinking, Well, she’s not entirely wrong. Careful. What you do next can strengthen several relationships or quietly weaken them.

Listen. Ask questions. Help her put words around what she is feeling. Ask what Mom actually said, what happened before Mom said it, and what she thinks Mom is concerned about. Help her consider whether there may be something she does not yet understand. Proverbs gives us wonderfully practical wisdom here: “He who answers a matter before he hears it—this is folly and disgrace to him” (Proverbs 18:13). A few verses later comes another reality check: “The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him” (Proverbs 18:17).

That does not mean the teenager is lying. It means one person’s account is one person’s account, and that is true when the person is fifteen as well as when the person is fifty-five. Take the child’s experience seriously without assuming the child’s interpretation is complete.

Research on adolescence makes this distinction especially important. Parent-adolescent conflict is a normal feature of adolescence, including disagreements surrounding independence, responsibilities, rules, friendships, and personal decisions, although the presence of disagreement should not be confused with the inevitability or healthiness of hostility.⁵ Developmental research also consistently distinguishes healthy support for growing independence from psychologically controlling parenting.⁶ Christians will frame the destination somewhat differently from a secular ideal of autonomy. We are not trying to produce people who are simply independent of other people, and certainly not independent of God. We are preparing a child to become an adult who increasingly takes personal responsibility before God.

That requires practice. So when your niece says Mom is unreasonable, you do not need to begin by defending Mom, but neither do you need to join the prosecution. Sometimes, after listening carefully, one of the most loving questions you can ask is remarkably simple: “Have you told your mother what you just told me?”

If the answer is no, perhaps the next step is not another hour of talking about Mom. Perhaps it is helping your niece prepare to talk with Mom: “I think you need to tell her. If you’re not sure how to say it, let’s work through that together. And next week I’m going to ask you how it went.” That is not brushing her off, and it is not taking Mom’s side. That is mentoring her.

Be a Confidant, Not a Confederate

There is an important difference between becoming someone’s confidant and becoming someone’s confederate. A confidant listens carefully, helps us think, and tells us the truth even when the truth is not entirely on our side. A confidant may protect an appropriate confidence while still encouraging us to do what is right. A confederate begins joining our side against someone else. Put simply, a confidant helps you deal with the person; a confederate helps you build a case against the person.

That distinction can become particularly important with teenagers because teenagers are still learning how to interpret relationships. They can accurately report what happened while misunderstanding why it happened. They can feel something intensely without possessing all the information the adults possess. They can also, like the rest of us, tell a story in a way that makes their own position look considerably more reasonable. Sometimes that is entirely unintentional; sometimes it isn’t.

Children eventually discover which adults are likely to say yes, which adults will sympathize, and which adults see Mom or Dad differently. A teenager who cannot persuade Mom may discover that Aunt is a very attractive appeals court. The adults should lovingly decline the appointment. Extended family should not become an appeals court for parental decisions.

Scripture repeatedly warns about speech that divides relationships. “A perverse man spreads dissension, and a gossip divides close friends” (Proverbs 16:28). Proverbs 17:9 similarly warns that repeatedly bringing up an offense can separate close friends. We need to apply those passages carefully. A teenager talking honestly with Aunt is not automatically gossip, and an aunt disagreeing with Mom is not automatically divisive. The better question is what the conversation is producing. Is it helping the child understand, move toward truth, take responsibility, and prepare for a needed conversation? Or is Aunt’s influence increasingly being built upon a shared negative interpretation of Mom?

Titus 2 gives us an interesting combination. The older women who are to “teach what is good” are also instructed not to be slanderers (Titus 2:3). Formative influence and disciplined speech belong together. Godly influence teaches what is good without building that influence by diminishing someone else. If your influence with a child is growing because the child’s respect for her parents is shrinking, it is worth asking how you are using your influence.

Help Them Go Back

This may be one of the most important principles in the entire discussion: When someone brings us a relationship problem, our first instinct should not be to become their substitute for the relationship. Whenever it is wise and safe, help them go back and strengthen the relationship itself.

Jesus places extraordinary value on dealing with broken relationships rather than merely carrying grievances about them. In Matthew 5:23–24, He describes someone remembering that a brother has something against him and tells him to “first go and be reconciled to your brother.” In Matthew 18:15, where actual sin is involved, Jesus says, “If your brother sins against you, go and confront him privately.” Neither passage says, “When your niece complains about her mother, send her home.” We should never make Scripture say more than it says. Yet these passages belong to a much larger biblical ethic of reconciliation, restoration, truth-telling, and peacemaking. Paul writes, “If it is possible on your part, live at peace with everyone” (Romans 12:18), while Galatians 6:1 calls mature believers to restore someone gently.

Taken together, the direction is significant. Biblical counsel should ordinarily move people toward faithful relationship, not make the counselor a substitute for it. That may mean helping a teenager distinguish between “Mom doesn’t love me” and “Mom made a decision I really don’t like.” Those sentences can feel identical at sixteen. They are not identical.

It may mean helping her recognize that parents sometimes have reasons children do not yet understand. A teenager has never raised a teenager. She may accurately understand what Mom decided without possessing enough life experience to understand everything Mom considered. It may also mean helping Mom listen because Mom really did miss something. The objective is not to send the teenager back to lose the argument. The objective is relationship, truth, growth, and, when something has been damaged, reconciliation.

Then follow up. “You were going to talk with your dad. How did it go?” Accountability communicates that the conversation mattered. It also keeps counsel from becoming merely another place to vent.

When You Think the Parents Are Wrong

Supporting parents does not require pretending parents are always right. Sometimes Aunt listens carefully and concludes, I think my brother is handling this badly. Now what? Ordinarily, go to your brother. Do not recruit his child to your interpretation of him. Do not make the teenager the courier. Do not quietly build a competing household philosophy through conversations with his daughter. Talk sideways to the adult rather than downward through the child.

You might say, “Can I tell you something I’m seeing? I could be missing something, but Sarah has talked with me several times, and I’m concerned. Would you let me tell you what I’m hearing?” Then tell the truth with love.

Ephesians 4 gives us an extraordinarily useful picture of healthy communication. We are to speak “the truth in love” (v. 15), put away falsehood and “speak truthfully to his neighbor” (v. 25), deal properly with anger (vv. 26–27), use words that build others up “according to their needs” (v. 29), and put away bitterness, rage, anger, slander, and malice while becoming kind and compassionate (vv. 31–32). Truth and love are not competitors.

Parents retain responsibility to make the decision, but extended family should be able to speak. A voice is not the same as a vote. Wise parents want trustworthy voices around them. They do not surrender their stewardship by listening to those voices. Sometimes those voices will save parents from mistakes.

Have the Conversation Before You Need It

I would love to see more families do something remarkably simple while the children are still young: talk. Not because there is a problem, but because someday there probably will be one.

Parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles, and other especially close adults can establish a shared understanding long before a fourteen-year-old arrives in Aunt’s kitchen furious because Dad confiscated the phone. Begin here: We want you in their lives. “We want them to call you. We want them to trust you. We want you to speak truth to them. We know there may be times when they hear something from you that they are not presently hearing from us. We consider your relationship with them a gift.”

Then talk about what that means. “If they’re frustrated with us, please listen. Help them think. Don’t assume the first account is necessarily the whole account. When appropriate, help them come back and talk with us. If you think we’re doing something wrong, come tell us. We promise to work at listening before defending ourselves. If you think you’re beginning to overstep, ask. If we think you’re beginning to overstep, we’ll try to tell you kindly and directly.” Establish one more promise as well: We will not work out adult disagreements through the children.

Philippians 2:3–4 gives the adults exactly the posture such a conversation requires: humility, freedom from selfish ambition, and genuine attention to the interests of others. Imagine the difference if families established this understanding when children were six rather than trying to negotiate it for the first time when they were sixteen and everybody had already selected legal counsel. 😂 This is not a restriction on extended family. It is an invitation into stewardship.

Privacy Is Not Secrecy

Trusted relationships require some room for privacy. If every conversation a teenager has with Aunt is immediately reported to Mom, the relationship will not remain very trustworthy for long. A teenager should be able to tell Aunt, “I’m really angry with Mom,” without Aunt necessarily calling Mom before the child reaches the driveway. A teenager may tell Uncle, “I’m embarrassed about something and don’t know how to talk with Dad,” and Uncle may be able to help without immediately reporting the conversation. Appropriate privacy can serve trust.

Research on adolescent disclosure gives parents an important reason not to respond to this reality merely by increasing surveillance. Studies have repeatedly found meaningful connections between supportive parent-child relationships and adolescents’ willingness to disclose information. A meta-analysis examining parental knowledge found adolescent disclosure to be particularly important, while longitudinal research has linked adolescents’ perception of parental support with greater disclosure and fewer secrets.⁷ ⁸ Other work suggests adolescents themselves distinguish among personal matters, moral issues, and matters involving safety or prudence, and parents and teenagers do not always draw those lines in the same places.⁹ In other words, knowing what is happening in a teenager’s life is not merely a monitoring problem. It is partly a relationship problem.

Yet privacy and secrecy are not synonyms. Proverbs praises the trustworthy person who knows how to keep a confidence (Proverbs 11:13), but that does not mean every secret must be kept regardless of its consequences. When a child asks another adult to conceal serious wrongdoing, danger, exploitation, destructive behavior, or circumstances in which someone may be harmed, the adult’s responsibility changes. Medical guidance regarding adolescents likewise recognizes an appropriate sphere of confidential conversation while making room for necessary intervention when safety is at risk.¹⁰

Even in ordinary matters, an extended-family member should be cautious about becoming the keeper of secrets whose purpose is to maintain a hidden alliance against the parents. A useful question may be: Am I protecting this child’s appropriate privacy, or am I helping maintain something that should be brought into the light? Those are very different things.

Parents, Make Yourselves Approachable

Parents, before we become too enthusiastic about everything Aunt needs to learn, we need to turn the telescope around. It would be terribly easy to read this article and conclude, Excellent. Someone has finally documented why my sister needs to stay in her lane. That would miss half the article.

Parents have a responsibility to make truth reasonably safe to bring to them. James gives every member of the family the same instruction: “Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak, and slow to anger, for man’s anger does not bring about the righteousness that God desires” (James 1:19–20). There is no parental exemption.

Suppose Aunt says, “I need to tell you something difficult. Sarah has talked with me several times. I’m trying very hard not to get between you, but I think there’s something she wants you to understand.” Mom and Dad can immediately become defensive—What has she been telling you about us?—or they can say, Help us understand. Those are profoundly different responses.

Aunt may have handled part of the situation badly and still have something true to tell them. Daughter may have behaved disrespectfully and still have a legitimate concern. Dad may have made the correct decision and communicated it harshly. Mom may have been unfairly characterized and still discover something in the criticism that she needs to hear. We do not have to choose one offender in order to tell the truth about everyone. Fairness does not require equal blame. Truth requires accurate responsibility.

Parents should be particularly curious when their children repeatedly seek another adult for conversations they will not have at home. The first question should not automatically be, How do we stop this? Sometimes the better question is, What is our child finding there that has become difficult to find with us?

Maybe nothing is wrong. Talking to Aunt may simply feel different from talking to Mom. Perhaps the answer is less comfortable. Maybe Aunt listens longer. Maybe Uncle asks questions before offering solutions. Maybe the teenager fears disappointing Dad. Maybe previous attempts to tell Mom difficult things did not go particularly well. We do not know until we ask, so have ears and hearts open enough to hear the answer.

When Children Play Adults Against One Another

We also need to leave room for another reality. Sometimes children unintentionally create conflict between adults simply because they perceive conversations differently. They tell Mom what Aunt said as they understood it, not necessarily as Aunt intended it. Sometimes they selectively report, and sometimes they knowingly play one adult against another.

Children eventually learn where sympathy lives. If Dad says no but Uncle thinks Dad is too strict, a teenager may learn to take the issue to Uncle. If Mom will not permit something but Grandma usually thinks Mom worries too much, Grandma may become the next stop. That does not mean every teenager doing this is a calculating manipulator. It means teenagers are human beings learning how relationships work—and occasionally learning how to work the relationships. We should love them enough not to participate.

Proverbs 18:17 becomes valuable again: the first account may sound persuasive until another perspective is heard. Ephesians 4:25 requires truthfulness from everyone involved, not merely the adults. Suppose your child reports, “Aunt Susan says you’re way too strict.” Do not respond to the summary as though you personally heard Aunt Susan say it. Ask questions. Then, if it matters, talk with Aunt Susan.

Perhaps Aunt actually said, “I understand why you’re disappointed. Your mom may be stricter about this than I would be, but she loves you, and you need to talk with her.” The teenager reports: Aunt agrees with me. Close. Not quite. 😂 Sometimes the distortion is innocent and requires clarification. Sometimes selective reporting requires correction and maturity. Sometimes deliberate manipulation requires discipline and repentance. First, discover reality.

Children have far less opportunity to play adults against one another when the adults maintain direct, trusting communication with each other. The teenager should not have to become the family’s message carrier, intelligence service, or diplomatic corps. The adults can talk.

The Spouse in the Middle

Extended-family conflict becomes particularly difficult when the person involved is one spouse’s brother or sister. Of course Dad sees his sister differently from his wife. He has forty years of history his wife does not possess. That history is valuable information, but it is not necessarily objective information. Sometimes familiarity gives us context; sometimes familiarity gives us a blind spot.

Scripture repeatedly warns against partiality. James 2 addresses partiality in a different setting, while 1 Timothy 5:21 gives the broader instruction to do nothing out of partiality. We should not misuse either passage to declare that every spouse who initially defends a sibling is guilty of biblical partiality. Yet the principle should make us humble enough to ask whether affection and familiarity are affecting our judgment.

Dad should not automatically dismiss Wife’s concern because he knows Sister better. Wife should not demand that Dad prove loyalty to the marriage by immediately agreeing that Sister is the problem. Both perspectives contain information, and neither spouse gets automatic interpretive supremacy. One spouse should not minimize a sibling’s inappropriate influence, and the other should not unilaterally govern the sibling relationship. They are parents together.

Before establishing a boundary outside the marriage, establish understanding inside the marriage. Your spouse should not have to compete with your sibling for the privilege of being heard about your own child.

When Everybody Has Something to Own

Family problems become unnecessarily difficult when everybody is waiting for somebody else to change first. Parents want Aunt to stop interfering. Aunt wants Mom to listen. Mom wants Dad to quit defending his sister. Dad wants everybody to calm down. Teenager wants somebody to admit that she has a point—and perhaps she does.

Nobody gets off the hook.

Aunt may need to repent for something she said. Mom may need to listen without defending herself. Dad may need to stop minimizing something because the person involved is his sister. Daughter may need to admit that she played one adult against another. Uncle may need to stop discussing something that is not his decision to make. Parents may need to acknowledge that their child went elsewhere because conversations at home had become unnecessarily difficult.

We want Dad to repent, Mom to change, Husband to act, Wife to listen, children to take responsibility, aunts and uncles to use their influence wisely, the wounded to speak truth, and the wrongdoer to repair what can be repaired. We want everybody involved to learn how to love more faithfully.

Explanation is not exoneration. Understanding why someone did something helps us love wisely; it does not erase responsibility for what was done.

Galatians 6 gives us a useful Both/And. We are told to “carry one another’s burdens” (v. 2), yet only a few verses later, “each one should carry his own load” (v. 5). Those statements are not contradictions. Christian love helps carry what is crushing while personal responsibility still matters. That gives us a useful family principle: Carry what love requires you to carry. Do not take from another person what God requires them to carry.

The objective is not to determine which member of the family deserves the black hat. The objective is for everyone to own what actually belongs to them and do the next right thing.

When a Conversation Is Enough

Not every problem needs a boundary. Suppose Dad and Mom talk with Aunt, explain what has concerned them, and Aunt says, “I didn’t realize that’s what I was doing. I’m sorry. I love her, and I don’t want to get between you. I’ll handle it differently.” Wonderful. Perhaps Mom also says, “I realize I reacted defensively when you tried to tell me something last month. I’m sorry for that too.” Even better.

Nobody needs to produce a policy manual, reduce contact, declare Aunt unsafe, or convene a family summit at a neutral location with name tags and parliamentary procedure. Someone spoke truth. Someone listened. People owned what belonged to them. Behavior changed. That is what we wanted.

Paul’s description of love in 1 Corinthians 13 is not sentimental decoration for weddings. Love is patient and kind. It is not self-seeking or easily angered. It “rejoices with the truth” (vv. 4–6). That last phrase matters because love and reality belong together. The purpose of confronting a problem is not to earn the right to establish a boundary. The purpose is to move toward truth, responsibility, reconciliation, and healthier love.

When a Boundary Becomes Necessary

Sometimes the conversation does not solve the problem. Aunt continues contradicting parental decisions to the child. Uncle continues encouraging secrecy. Grandma continues telling the children that Mom and Dad’s rules are foolish. A family member repeatedly uses private conversations with the child to criticize the parents, undermine their convictions, or cultivate an allegiance that competes with the household. Now greater clarity may be necessary.

The parents may need to say, “We love the relationship you have with her, and we want to preserve it. But this particular behavior cannot continue.” That is a boundary. Notice what it is trying to protect: not parental pride, not immunity from disagreement, and not the fantasy that Mom and Dad are always right. It protects the parents’ ability to carry the responsibility entrusted to them while preserving as much healthy extended-family relationship as possible.

If the behavior continues, the boundary may require consequences. Access may need to change. Certain conversations may need to become off-limits. Unsupervised time may need to decrease for a season. Those decisions should not be made vindictively. A boundary is not punishment for disagreeing with us. It is protection when someone repeatedly interferes with a responsibility that does not belong to them.

Even then, whenever wisdom and safety permit, the hope remains restoration. Love does not require unlimited access, and limited access does not eliminate the obligation to love. The boundary is not the destination.

When You’re Reading This Five Years Too Late

Perhaps nobody had the conversation when the children were eight. Now they’re sixteen. Aunt has been saying things she shouldn’t. Mom is angry. Dad has defended his sister too long. Daughter has learned that Aunt is the easiest place to take grievances about home, and everybody is carrying a different version of what happened. You may be reading all of this thinking, Well, this would have been extremely helpful about five years ago.

Fair enough.

Start now.

You do not have to finish now, but you do have to start now. Do not necessarily begin by issuing prohibitions. Get the adults talking. Listen. Clarify what has actually happened. Own what belongs to you. Apologize where necessary. Ask forgiveness. Decide what kind of relationship you want the child to have with extended family. Clarify parental responsibility and healthy extended-family influence. Agree that adult concerns will ordinarily travel directly to adults rather than through the child. Help the child take appropriate concerns back to the parents. Clarify privacy and secrecy. Establish boundaries where boundaries have actually become necessary. Then follow up.

Ephesians 4:31–32 gives us the spirit in which repair happens: bitterness, rage, anger, slander, and malice are to be put away, while kindness, compassion, and forgiveness take their place. Romans 12:17–21 likewise rejects vengeance and calls us toward peace and overcoming evil with good. Forgiveness does not require pretending nothing happened. Reconciliation does not require abandoning truth. Repentance does not require instant perfection; it does require a new direction.

The family that did not establish healthy patterns when the children were eight can begin establishing them when they are sixteen. It may be harder, but it is not too late to start.

The Progression Matters

Perhaps we can summarize the ordinary process this way:

Relationship → Understanding → Conversation → Reconciliation → Clarification → Boundary → Consequence

Notice where boundary appears. It is not first.

Do not rush past the earlier steps merely because boundaries sound decisive. At the same time, do not endlessly repeat conversations when someone has demonstrated that conversation alone will not change the behavior. Love is patient, and love is also truthful. Gentleness does not require passivity, and firmness does not require hostility.

Jesus blesses the peacemakers (Matthew 5:9). Peacemaking is not the same as peacekeeping. Sometimes maintaining the appearance of peace merely postpones the uncomfortable conversation genuine peace requires. The boundary should serve the relationship whenever possible. The relationship does not exist to serve the boundary.

What Are We Trying to Build?

Someday these children will no longer be children. The sixteen-year-old who thinks Mom’s decision makes absolutely no sense may one day have a sixteen-year-old of her own. Something remarkable may happen: she may understand. Or she may decide Mom really was wrong.

Either way, we want her to have learned something larger than whether she was allowed to attend the party. We want her to have learned how to listen, how to tell the truth, how to disagree without contempt, how to receive correction, how to seek counsel without recruiting allies, how to reconcile after conflict, how to recognize appropriate authority without treating human authority as infallible, and how to take responsibility for what belongs to her. We want Aunt, Uncle, Mom, Dad, Grandma, Grandpa, and the other adults around her to have modeled those very things.

Research on mentoring, adolescent disclosure, family relationships, and intergenerational influence can help us understand some of the mechanics. Scripture tells us something deeper about the destination. We are not merely trying to produce children who successfully navigate adolescence. We are helping form people who know how to love.

Our children do not need fewer people who love them. They need more people who know how to love them well. Parents have something God has entrusted particularly to them. Extended family has influence worth stewarding. Children are gradually learning to carry responsibility themselves. Spouses are learning to hear one another. Everybody is learning to tell the truth and learning to listen.

Everybody has someone to love, something to steward, and somewhere not to trespass.

Perhaps that gives us the best question of all: What has God entrusted to me in this relationship, and how can I steward it for this person’s good? Not, How much authority can I claim? Not, How do I prove that I was right? Not even, Where should I put the boundary? Start further upstream: What has God entrusted to me, and what does love require me to do with it?

Then do the next right thing.

Because the destination was never merely better boundaries.

The destination is faithful love.

[Safety Reminder: Reconciliation is important, but safety is not sacrificed in its name. When abuse, suspected child abuse or neglect, sexual misconduct or exploitation, domestic violence, self-harm or suicidal concerns, credible threats, serious substance-related danger, or other significant risk is present or suspected, involve appropriate qualified professional, emergency, law-enforcement, child-protection, pastoral, or other responsible help as circumstances require. A child should never be instructed to confront an alleged abuser privately or to preserve family harmony by remaining silent about harm.]

---

Five Coaching Questions

1. Parents: Are we genuinely grateful for other trustworthy adults who love and influence our children, or do we become territorial when our children trust someone besides us?
2. Extended family: When a child brings us a conflict with his or her parents, does our counsel make that child more capable of dealing faithfully with the parents—or more dependent upon us as an alternative to them?
3. All adults: Have we created direct enough relationships with one another that concerns can travel adult-to-adult rather than through the child?
4. Parents: If our child repeatedly tells another trusted adult things he or she will not tell us, are we willing to ask what might be difficult about bringing those things home—and listen carefully enough to hear the answer?
5. Everyone: What has God actually entrusted to me in this relationship—and am I faithfully stewarding that, rather than trying to control what He entrusted to someone else?

---

Endnotes

1. Levi van Dam, D. Smit, B. Wildschut, Susan J. T. Branje, Jean E. Rhodes, Mark Assink, and Geert Jan J. M. Stams, “Does Natural Mentoring Matter? A Multilevel Meta-analysis on the Association Between Natural Mentoring and Youth Outcomes,” American Journal of Community Psychology 62, nos. 1–2 (2018): 203–220. The meta-analysis included 30 studies and found that both the presence and, more strongly, the quality of natural mentoring relationships were positively associated with youth outcomes. Primary study / DOI
2. David L. DuBois and Naida Silverthorn, “Natural Mentoring Relationships and Adolescent Health: Evidence From a National Study,” American Journal of Public Health 95, no. 3 (2005): 518–524. Using nationally representative Add Health data, the authors found that more than 40 percent of identified natural mentors were family members; specifically, 7.8 percent were aunts and 5.6 percent were uncles. Mentoring was associated with favorable outcomes in several educational, behavioral, psychological, and health domains, although not every outcome examined showed an association. Primary study / PubMed Central
3. Laura L. Ellingson and Patricia J. Sotirin, “Exploring Young Adults’ Perspectives on Communication With Aunts,” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 23, no. 3 (2006). Thematic analysis of nieces’ and nephews’ accounts identified aunt roles including teacher, role model, confidante, savvy peer, and second mother. Primary study / DOI
4. Robert M. Milardo, The Forgotten Kin: Aunts and Uncles (Cambridge University Press, 2009). Milardo’s research examines how aunts and uncles support parents, sometimes buffer parent-child relationships, develop distinctive relationships with nieces and nephews, and participate in mentoring across generations. Cambridge University Press
5. Bridget B. Weymouth, Cheryl Buehler, Nan Zhou, and Robert A. Henson, “A Meta-Analysis of Parent–Adolescent Conflict: Disagreement, Hostility, and Youth Maladjustment,” Journal of Family Theory & Review 8, no. 1 (2016): 95–112. The meta-analysis synthesized 401 effects from 52 studies and describes parent-adolescent conflict as a normative feature of adolescence while distinguishing disagreement and hostility and examining their associations with youth maladjustment. Primary study / DOI
6. Emma L. Bradshaw, Jasper J. Duineveld, James H. Conigrave, Ben A. Steward, Kelly A. Ferber, Mireille Joussemet, Philip D. Parker, and Richard M. Ryan, “Disentangling Autonomy-Supportive and Psychologically Controlling Parenting: A Meta-Analysis of Self-Determination Theory’s Dual Process Model Across Cultures,” American Psychologist 80, no. 6 (2025): 879–895. Across 238 studies involving 126,423 participants, parental autonomy support was positively associated with child well-being, while psychological control was positively associated with child ill-being. These psychological constructs should not be equated simplistically with biblical categories of parental authority or obedience. Primary study / DOI
7. Dong Liu, Dongzhen Chen, and B. Bradford Brown, “Do Parenting Practices and Child Disclosure Predict Parental Knowledge? A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 49, no. 1 (2020): 1–16. This meta-analysis of 32 studies found children’s disclosure more strongly associated with parental knowledge than the parental strategies examined, with the exception of parental warmth; warmth and behavioral control appeared to help establish conditions supporting disclosure. Primary study / PubMed
8. Lauree Tilton-Weaver, “Adolescents’ Information Management: Comparing Ideas About Why Adolescents Disclose to or Keep Secrets From Their Parents,” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 43, no. 5 (2014): 803–813. In a longitudinal sample of 874 adolescents ages 12–16, adolescents who perceived their parents as supportive subsequently disclosed more and kept fewer secrets; the study generally did not support the idea that greater parental monitoring itself produced greater adolescent disclosure. Primary study / PubMed
9. Judith G. Smetana, Aaron Metzger, Denise C. Gettman, and Nicole Campione-Barr, “Disclosure and Secrecy in Adolescent–Parent Relationships,” Child Development 77, no. 1 (2006): 201–217. Adolescents and parents differed in their judgments about obligations to disclose across personal, moral, conventional, multifaceted, and prudential matters; adolescents regarded disclosure as more obligatory for prudential matters and less obligatory for personal matters, while parents generally expected more disclosure than adolescents did. Trust and parental acceptance were among the factors associated with disclosure and secrecy. Primary study / DOI
10. Richard J. Chung et al., “Confidentiality in the Care of Adolescents: Policy Statement,” Pediatrics 153, no. 5 (2024): e2024066326, American Academy of Pediatrics. The AAP recommends opportunities for adolescents to communicate privately with health professionals and recognizes confidentiality as important to adolescent trust and engagement, while also recognizing that confidentiality is not absolute and may need to be breached when necessary to preserve safety or meet legal obligations. American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement

---